This assessment required a critical evaluation of ChatGPT’s response to the question “How can AI make work easier for employees?” in comparison to current academic literature. The task aimed to assess the quality, usefulness, and limitations of ChatGPT’s answer and to reflect on the personal and professional implications of using generative AI. The essay first analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT’s initial response, noting its practical structure and general insights. To address this, relevant peer-reviewed literature was reviewed to compare and support or contrast ChatGPT’s points, incorporating themes such as AI in education, HRM, and automation. The final section included a personal reflection on future use of generative AI in academic and work settings, with an emphasis on ethical considerations, creativity, and productivity. The essay followed the suggested structure and incorporated multiple academic sources to ensure robust evaluation.

Competences: Management, Accounting Marketing, International Relations

Competences: Finance, Economics, Business Strategy, and Entrepreneurship

Competences: Law, Political Science, Public Policy, and Negotiation

Competences: Psychology, Sociology, Counseling, and Human Development

Competences: Environmental Science, Sustainability and Renewable Energy

Competences: History, International Law, Diplomacy, and Geopolitical Analysis











